If an agent is comparing a home with a pool to a subject property without a pool, what action should they take?

When comparing a home with a pool to a property without one, it is important to consider the difference in value that the pool contributes to the overall property. By subtracting the price value of the pool from the home that has it, the agent is effectively leveling the playing field between the two properties for a more accurate comparison. This means that the agent can determine what the home without a pool would be worth if it had similar features and amenities to the other home.

The value of a pool can vary widely based on factors like location, quality, and maintenance costs. Subtracting the pool's price value allows the agent to assess the market value of the property without the pool, ensuring that the analysis is fair and that buyers can see the real value of each home. This approach also helps potential buyers understand what they may be missing if they choose a property without a pool.

In contrast, leaving the prices unchanged would not account for the additional value associated with the pool, nor would it give an accurate depiction of market comparables. Adding the pool's price value would misrepresent the home without a pool, inflating its value artificially. Estimating maintenance costs may provide useful information, but it doesn't directly address the valuation needed in this context. Thus